Marie-charlotte Guetlein
Département
Management & Technology
Nationalité
Germany
Fonction
Assistant Professor
Assistant Professor with a PhD from ETH Zurich and a Master's degree from Sciences Po Paris. Her research focuses on the study of individual and household preferences and behavioral biases, with applications to technology adoption and energy efficiency policy analysis.
- Consumer Behavior
- Experimental Design
- Sustainable Development
- Economics
- Experimental Economics
Cours enseignés à Grenoble Ecole de Management :
- Quantitative Methods for Business Research - Master - 2018
- Quantitative Methods for Business Research - Master - De 2018 à 2021
- Innovation - De 2022 à 2023
- Digital Literacy - 2021
- Méthodes d'Aide à la Décision - Licence - Depuis 2020
- Entrepreneuriat technologique et social pour transformer le secteur de l'énergie - Depuis 2021
- Research Methods for Managers - Master - 2020
- Introduction to Theories of Management - PhD - De 2023 à 2024
- Business Economic Environment 2 - Depuis 2021
- Quantitative Methods for Finance - 2021
- Décisions Avancées - 2020
- Advanced Decision Techniques - 2020
- Techniques of Decision-making - Depuis 2022
- Transformation de l’entreprise - Master - Depuis 2023
- Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Faure C., Tu G., 2026.Energy literacy, income, and choice of energy-efficient appliances: A discrete choice experiment and welfare analysis in eight European countriesApplied Economics, 58, 12: 2383-2397
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2026.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureAMA Winter Academic Conference 2026, AMA - American Marketing Association, Madrid, Spain
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2025.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureEMAC Annual Conference 2025, EMAC European Marketing Academy, Madrid, Spain
- Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2024.Empirical insights into enabling and impeding factors for increasing citizen investments in renewable energy communitiesEnergy Policy, 193, October: 114302
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2024.Humans do it better? Exploring the existence of an artificiality bias in domains where performance is a fundamental product attributeEMAC Annual Conference 2024, EMAC European Marketing Academy, Bucharest, Romania
- Sebi C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Faure C., Sloot D., Rauch D., 2024.In France and Germany, politics - not nationality - dictate energy preferencesThe Conversation: Online
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2024.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureSIM Conference 2024, Società Italiana Marketing, Milan, Italy
- Fanghella V., Faure C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2023.Locus of control and other-regarding behavior: Experimental evidence from a large heterogeneous sampleJournal of Economic Psychology, 95, March: 102605
- Fanghella V., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Sebi C., 2023.Preferences on financing mechanisms for thermal retrofit measures in multi-owner buildings: A discrete choice experiment with landlords and owner-occupiers in FranceResource and Energy Economics , 74, August: 101392
- Fanghella V., Faure C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2023.What’s in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policiesEcological Economics, 204 Part A, February: 107659Public acceptability appears an essential condition for the success of low-carbon transition policies. In this paper, we investigate the role of self-interest on citizens’ preferences for the distribution of costs and environmental benefits of energy efficiency policies. Using a discrete choice experiment on nationally representative household samples of Sweden, Italy, and the United Kingdom, we first investigate preferences for national burden-sharing rules and for the distribution of environmental benefits accruing primarily in rural and/or urban areas. We examine the role of self-interest and self-serving bias in a correlational manner by looking at the effects of income and location of residency on preferences for these policy attributes. Moreover, we investigate the effect of self-serving bias on preferences for burden-sharing rules in a causal manner by experimentally priming randomly assigned groups of participants to feel either rich or poor. Our results suggest that the accountability rule is the most popular and the equal-amount rule the least popular burden-sharing rule. Further, policies with environmental benefits accruing primarily in rural areas are least preferred. We find some evidence for self-interest, especially through our correlational approach. Finally, across country samples, our results reveal heterogeneity in preferences for policy attributes and in the prevalence of self-interest.
Only the last ten publications are displayed
