Marie-charlotte Guetlein
Département
Management et Technologie
Nationalité
Allemagne
Fonction
Professeur Assistant
Professeur assistante avec un doctorat de l'ETH Zurich et un Master de Sciences Po Paris. Ses recherches portent sur l'étude des préférences des individus et des ménages et des biais comportementaux, avec des applications à l'adoption des technologies et à l'analyse des politiques d'efficacité énergétique.
- Comportement du consommateur
- Design expérimental
- Développement durable
- Economie
- Economie expérimentale
Cours enseignés à Grenoble Ecole de Management :
- Digital Literacy - 2021
- Quantitative Methods for Business Research - Master - 2018
- Quantitative Methods for Business Research - Master - De 2018 à 2021
- Quantitative Methods for Finance - 2021
- Business Economic Environment 2 - Depuis 2021
- Techniques of Decision-making - Depuis 2022
- Transformation de l’entreprise - Master - Depuis 2023
- Décisions Avancées - 2020
- Innovation - De 2022 à 2023
- Introduction to Theories of Management - Doctorat - De 2023 à 2024
- Research Methods for Managers - Master - 2020
- Advanced Decision Techniques - 2020
- Méthodes d'Aide à la Décision - Licence - Depuis 2020
- Entrepreneuriat technologique et social pour transformer le secteur de l'énergie - Depuis 2021
- Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Faure C., Tu G., 2026.Energy literacy, income, and choice of energy-efficient appliances: A discrete choice experiment and welfare analysis in eight European countriesApplied Economics: Online first
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2026.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureAMA Winter Academic Conference 2026, AMA - American Marketing Association, Madrid, Espagne
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2025.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureEMAC Annual Conference 2025, EMAC European Marketing Academy, Madrid, Espagne
- Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2024.Empirical insights into enabling and impeding factors for increasing citizen investments in renewable energy communitiesEnergy Policy, 193, October: 114302
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2024.Humans do it better? Exploring the existence of an artificiality bias in domains where performance is a fundamental product attributeEMAC Annual Conference 2024, EMAC European Marketing Academy, Bucharest, Roumanie
- Sebi C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Faure C., Sloot D., Rauch D., 2024.In France and Germany, politics - not nationality - dictate energy preferencesThe Conversation: Online
- Canfora B., Mai R., Guetlein M.-C., 2024.Human Dominance Belief Scale: Measurement of the Belief in Humans’ Ability to Dominate NatureSIM Conference 2024, Società Italiana Marketing, Milan, Italie
- Fanghella V., Faure C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2023.Locus of control and other-regarding behavior: Experimental evidence from a large heterogeneous sampleJournal of Economic Psychology, 95, March: 102605
- Fanghella V., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., Sebi C., 2023.Preferences on financing mechanisms for thermal retrofit measures in multi-owner buildings: A discrete choice experiment with landlords and owner-occupiers in FranceResource and Energy Economics , 74, August: 101392
- Fanghella V., Faure C., Guetlein M.-C., Schleich J., 2023.What’s in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policiesEcological Economics, 204 Part A, February: 107659Public acceptability appears an essential condition for the success of low-carbon transition policies. In this paper, we investigate the role of self-interest on citizens’ preferences for the distribution of costs and environmental benefits of energy efficiency policies. Using a discrete choice experiment on nationally representative household samples of Sweden, Italy, and the United Kingdom, we first investigate preferences for national burden-sharing rules and for the distribution of environmental benefits accruing primarily in rural and/or urban areas. We examine the role of self-interest and self-serving bias in a correlational manner by looking at the effects of income and location of residency on preferences for these policy attributes. Moreover, we investigate the effect of self-serving bias on preferences for burden-sharing rules in a causal manner by experimentally priming randomly assigned groups of participants to feel either rich or poor. Our results suggest that the accountability rule is the most popular and the equal-amount rule the least popular burden-sharing rule. Further, policies with environmental benefits accruing primarily in rural areas are least preferred. We find some evidence for self-interest, especially through our correlational approach. Finally, across country samples, our results reveal heterogeneity in preferences for policy attributes and in the prevalence of self-interest.
Seules les 10 dernières publications sont affichées
