ENFR
NEWS2024-07-05

Continuing Education: The Financial Times ranks GEM 8th in France

Financial times Executive education ranking 2024

Reading time : 4 min

Grenoble Ecole de Management (GEM) is ranked 8th in France in the Financial Times report on Executive Education published on May 20, 2024. The custom programs are placed 41st worldwide and rank in the top 30 for client satisfaction, client recommendation rate, and continuous engagement with program participants.

GEM’s rankings according to the Financial Times Executive Education Report

- 8th in France for Executive Education 
- 41st worldwide for Custom Programs (Executive Education - customized programs) 
- 27th worldwide for Client Satisfaction 
- 30th worldwide for Client Satisfaction in Collaboration and Co-construction of Programs 
- 28th worldwide for Client Recommendation Rate 
- 29th worldwide for Continuous Engagement with Program Participants

exterieur école GEM campus Sémard

 

Six criteria where GEM’s Executive Education excels

1 Executive Education: 8th in France 

Grenoble Ecole de Management ranks 8th in France for executive education, highlighting the efficiency and quality of the programs offered by the school. This distinction is due to GEM’s innovative approach, which combines research and operational practices to deliver high-impact programs.

2 Custom Programs: 41st Worldwide 

GEM achieves the 41st place worldwide for custom programs. This result is the fruit of the work of dedicated teams who design and support companies in their specific training needs. GEM’s faculty comprises both academic profiles and industry experts, including former business executives and high-level specialists, allowing precise responses to companies’ specific needs.

Button: Want to train your teams? Contact us for a custom quote.
 

3 Client Satisfaction: 27th Worldwide 

The school is ranked 27th worldwide for client satisfaction, illustrating the excellence of its teaching and the relevance of its programs. GEM is committed to offering well-constructed and coherent programs that meet companies’ training requirements.

4 Collaboration and Co-construction: 30th Worldwide 

Client satisfaction regarding the collaboration and co-construction of programs places GEM at 30th worldwide. This aspect ensures that programs are developed in close cooperation with companies, precisely meeting their needs and expectations. The cross-contributions between research and operational practices guarantee a real and lasting impact for client companies.
 

Etudiants exec-groupwork1-1000x667.jpg

5 Client Recommendation Rate: 28th Worldwide 

GEM also stands out for its client recommendation rate, ranking 28th worldwide. This recognition reflects client satisfaction and their willingness to continue their collaboration with the school, whether for ongoing training or the creation of new programs. The team dedicated to companies is imbued with a strong client-oriented culture, specifically reflected in personalized content and maintaining a high-quality service offer.

6 Continuous Engagement: 29th Worldwide 

GEM’s continuous engagement with its program participants earns it the 29th place worldwide. This commitment is demonstrated through mentoring activities, personalized coaching sessions, and communities of practice, offering constant support even after the end of the training programs.

 

A commitment to continuous excellence

The Financial Times ranking published on May 20, 2024, which places Grenoble Ecole de Management 41st worldwide and 8th in France for custom programs, is the result of the dedicated work of its teams. These devoted teams design and support companies in their specific training needs, ensuring quality education and sustained engagement reflected in the school’s excellent rankings.

See the complete ranking

  • Ranking
  • Continuing education

This might interest you

Consent to Care: Is the Patient Truly Free? - Expert opinion

Charles-Clemens Rüling2024-10-14
consentement aux soins - consent to healthcare

Patient Consent – How free are they in their choices with doctors?

Charles-Clemens Rüling2024-10-09